Learning Cadence editorial, , 7 min readHow we work
There is a category of meeting where eight people spend an hour, nothing is decided, and everyone agrees to discuss it further next week. The cost is roughly a full working day of salary, and it repeats fortnightly.
Fixing this is less about facilitation technique than about being willing to not have the meeting, and being willing to end it when the decision has been made rather than when the hour is up.
The short answer
Write the decision in the invite, or cancel the meeting.
A meeting ends in a decision when the invite already states what will be decided, only the people who decide are in the room, the context went out in advance, and someone names who decides at the start. Interrupt drift specifically, and end on the decision, the owner and the date. If you cannot write the decision sentence, cancel.
The method
Six steps, in order.
The first step removes more wasted time than the other five combined.
01
Write the decision in the invite, or cancel it
The invite should say what will be decided or produced: decide whether we launch in October or November. If you cannot write that sentence, you do not have a meeting, you have a status update, and a status update should be a written message. This single test removes more wasted time than any other change.
02
Invite the people who decide, not the people who might be interested
Each additional attendee adds another schedule and perspective to manage. Invite the people who decide or directly inform the decision, and send the outcome to everyone else.
03
Send the context in advance and expect it to be read
One page, sent the day before, with the options and the recommendation. If people arrive without having read it, spend the first five minutes reading it in silence instead of presenting it aloud. That keeps the meeting focused on discussion rather than narration.
04
Name who decides, out loud, at the start
If the decision owner is unclear, say it in the first minute: this is Ana's decision, and we are here to give her what she needs. That separates useful input from a requirement for consensus.
05
Interrupt the drift, specifically
When the conversation moves to an adjacent problem, say so and park it: that is a real issue and it is not this decision, I am putting it on the list. This can feel abrupt at first, but it protects the purpose stated in the invite.
06
End on the decision, the owner, and the date
In the last two minutes, say the decision aloud, name who owns the next step, and give a date. Then end, even with twenty minutes left. Meetings that fill their allotted time teach people that the calendar governs the work rather than the other way around.
The hard part
Handling the people who break meetings.
These patterns recur often enough to prepare a sentence for each one.
The person who reopens a decision made three weeks ago. Say "we decided that on the tenth, and I am not reopening it today. If there is genuinely new information, send it to me and I will look". Firmness here protects every previous decision the group made.
The most senior person speaks first and narrows the discussion. Ask them privately in advance to hold their view until others have contributed, and explain why the order matters.
The person who will not stop talking. Use their name and a bridge: "thanks Sam, I want to hear from people who have not spoken". Waiting for a natural gap does not work, because there will not be one.
The silent person who raises objections afterwards in private. Ask them directly in the meeting, by name, before the decision is taken. If the objection still only arrives afterwards, that is a separate conversation to have with them one to one.
Deleting meetings
The audit worth doing once a quarter.
Take your recurring meetings and ask one question of each: if this stopped happening tomorrow, what would actually break? Not what would feel odd, what would break.
If the only consequence is losing a status update, test a written update instead. Cancel the meeting for a month rather than permanently, then restore it only if a specific need appears.
The status meeting is the usual candidate. Its real function is often that someone does not trust that work is happening, which is a management problem wearing a calendar invite as a disguise.
Where we fit
How Cadence covers this.
We build Cadence, so this is a disclosure and not advice.
Cadence has a reviewed course on running meetings, in short daily lessons. Meetings are a good fit for the daily format because you get roughly one meeting a day to practise on, so a lesson in the morning has somewhere to go by the afternoon.
There is also a course on using your calendar deliberately, which is the other half of the problem for anyone whose week is already consumed by other people's invitations.
Put it into practice
Start it today, ten minutes at a time.
If you want to keep going, Cadence turns what brought you here into a course of short daily lessons with practice and saved progress. Cadence is our app.
Questions
Common questions.
How do I make meetings more effective?
Write the decision the meeting will produce into the invite. If you cannot write that sentence, the meeting is a status update and should be a written message instead. Then invite only the people who decide, send context in advance, name who has the call, and end when the decision is made, not when the hour is up.
Who should I invite to a meeting?
The people who make or directly inform the decision. Everyone else can get the notes. Each extra attendee adds another schedule and perspective to manage, so invite them only when their input is needed in the room.
How do I stop a meeting from going off topic?
Name the drift and park it out loud: "that is a real issue and it is not this decision, I am adding it to the list". Do not rely on the conversation to return on its own. The interruption may feel abrupt, so connect it to the decision stated in the invite.
How long should a meeting be?
Shorter than the default your calendar offers, and finished as soon as the decision is made. Ending twenty minutes early is a feature. Do not keep talking only because the booking still has time left.
How do I know which meetings to cancel?
Ask what would break if each recurring meeting stopped tomorrow, and distinguish a real dependency from a routine that merely feels familiar. Cancel candidates for a month rather than permanently, then restore only the meetings that prove they serve a specific need.
See it in concrete terms
Open a real Cadence course.
These Cadence courses cover meetings and the calendar around them, one lesson at a time.