You read The Stranger and felt unsettled
You want to know what Camus was actually arguing.
Understand what the existentialists argued about freedom, choice and meaning.
Start with the claim that existence precedes essence, then follow how Kierkegaard, Sartre, de Beauvoir and Camus answered it in different ways. Each idea is tested on an ordinary choice, so you can see what the arguments say and where the thinkers disagree.
Type this when Cadence asks what you want to learn
I keep hearing about existentialism and want to understand what Kierkegaard, Sartre, de Beauvoir and Camus actually argued. I want to know what existence precedes essence means and whether any of it helps me think about my own choices.
Change any word so it fits your situation. The course is built from what you type and a few setup questions.
Start today
Useful on their own. The course is for when you want the whole skill, not just the first move.
Existence precedes essence means you are not made to a plan the way a tool is; you become who you are through what you do. Sartre's own illustration was a paper knife, designed for cutting before it exists. Write the idea in one sentence of your own before reading further.
Take an illustrative line: 'I have no choice, I have to stay in this job.' Sartre would ask which part is a fact (the rent is due) and which is a choice presented as a fact (not looking for other work). Rewrite it as 'I am choosing to stay because...' and see whether the reasons still hold. This illustrates the idea; it is not career advice.
Ask: what if nothing outside me gives my life its meaning? Kierkegaard answered with a personal leap of faith. Camus refused any leap and argued for living with the absurd in open revolt. Write one line on which answer you find more convincing, and one objection to it.
Sources: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: existentialism, including existence precedes essence and bad faith; Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: existentialism and its main thinkers. Practical examples are starting points, not promised results.
Before the course is built
Lesson 1 opens on the moment you describe, and the examples use your role. For this request, expect questions like these.
Right for now
You want to know what Camus was actually arguing.
You suspect the philosophy is more specific than that.
You want to think about freedom and responsibility without being told what to pick.
Course arc
Cadence writes the lessons for you, so the exact path follows your answers. This is the ground a course built from this sentence covers.
01 / 06Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and the questions they left for the twentieth century.
What it means to say no fixed human nature decides who you are.
Sartre's claim that we are responsible for our choices, and the ways we pretend we are not.
Camus on the clash between our demand for meaning and a silent world, and why he rejected despair.
De Beauvoir on how freedom depends on circumstances and on other people's freedom.
What the existentialists offer and where their critics think they go wrong.
What changes
Say what existence precedes essence means in plain words.
Distinguish Kierkegaard's faith, Sartre's freedom, de Beauvoir's situation and Camus's absurd.
Use the ideas to examine a real choice without treating them as a self-help formula.
Most existentialists start from the absence of a given meaning and argue that people still make meaning and remain responsible for what they do.
The label covers thinkers who disagreed sharply, religious and atheist alike. Camus, among others, rejected the label for himself.
Course questions
Put the core claim in your own sentence. Existence precedes essence means you are not made to a plan the way a tool is; you become who you are through what you do. Sartre's own illustration was a paper knife, designed for cutting before it exists. Write the idea in one sentence of your own before reading further. Spot bad faith in an ordinary sentence. Take an illustrative line: 'I have no choice, I have to stay in this job.' Sartre would ask which part is a fact (the rent is due) and which is a choice presented as a fact (not looking for other work). Rewrite it as 'I am choosing to stay because...' and see whether the reasons still hold. This illustrates the idea; it is not career advice. Compare two answers to one question. Ask: what if nothing outside me gives my life its meaning? Kierkegaard answered with a personal leap of faith. Camus refused any leap and argued for living with the absurd in open revolt. Write one line on which answer you find more convincing, and one objection to it.
No. Cadence builds the course when you type the sentence and answer a few setup questions, so the lessons follow your situation. This page describes what a course built from this request covers. You see the whole path before Lesson 1.
Start with the claim that existence precedes essence, then follow how Kierkegaard, Sartre, de Beauvoir and Camus answered it in different ways. Each idea is tested on an ordinary choice, so you can see what the arguments say and where the thinkers disagree. It sits under Philosophy in the Ideas & discovery part of the library.
No. Setup asks what you already know and where you want to use it, and the course starts from there. Bring a real situation if you have one; the examples are built around it.
Courses run 7 to 30 lessons of about 10 minutes, sized to what you asked for. One lesson a day is the intended pace, and you can go faster. Lessons can be read or played as audio.
No. Cadence is for practical self-learning and does not award accredited degrees or professional certification.
Start today
The sentence to type
I keep hearing about existentialism and want to understand what Kierkegaard, Sartre, de Beauvoir and Camus actually argued. I want to know what existence precedes essence means and whether any of it helps me think about my own choices.