You feel strongly and cannot argue it
The conviction is there and the reasoning is not.
Reason clearly when reasonable people disagree about what is right.
State the facts and uncertainties, identify affected people, then compare consequences, duties and character. Explain where those considerations conflict and what could change your judgment. A framework helps structure reasoning; it does not automatically select the right action.
Want new features first?
A starting goal
I want to reason more clearly about ethical dilemmas. Compare consequences, duties, and virtues using everyday cases where reasonable people might disagree.
Change any word so it fits your situation. The course is built from what you type and a few setup questions.
Start today
Useful on their own. The course is for when you want the whole skill, not just the first move.
Original case: you promised to help a friend prepare an exhibition, but another friend asks for help with an unexpected move on the same afternoon. Neither request is an emergency in this example. Check whether other helpers or a change of time are actually possible.
Consequences: what help or harm would each option produce? Duties: what weight does the existing promise carry? Character: what would a reliable and considerate response look like? The same action might satisfy more than one consideration; do not assume the lenses must disagree.
One defensible response might honor the promise while offering another time or helper for the move. If a serious urgent need emerged, reconsider the balance. Name that condition. The check is the quality and consistency of your reasons, not whether your answer matches an automatic score.
Before the course is built
Lesson 1 opens on the moment you describe, and the examples use your role. For this request, expect questions like these.
Right for now
The conviction is there and the reasoning is not.
The rules run out and you are left with judgment.
Ethical arguments with others go nowhere and you would like to understand why.
Course arc
Cadence writes the lessons for you, so the exact path follows your answers. This is the ground a course built from this sentence covers.
01 / 06Competing goods, uncertainty and the limits of rules.
Weighing outcomes, and where that reasoning breaks down.
Rules, rights and the things you should not do even for a good result.
What a good person would do, and why character matters to ethics.
Working dilemmas where the lenses conflict.
Disagreeing about ethics productively, and changing your mind when you should.
What changes
Apply consequences, duties and virtues to the same case and see what each reveals.
Find where two reasonable people actually part ways.
Reason to a view you can explain and revise.
Identify the reasons, facts and assumptions that could be questioned.
People may still disagree about values, facts or their relative weight. State the remaining disagreement fairly.
Course questions
Make the competing reasons explicit. Original case: you promised to help a friend prepare an exhibition, but another friend asks for help with an unexpected move on the same afternoon. Neither request is an emergency in this example. Check whether other helpers or a change of time are actually possible. Compare three questions. Consequences: what help or harm would each option produce? Duties: what weight does the existing promise carry? Character: what would a reliable and considerate response look like? The same action might satisfy more than one consideration; do not assume the lenses must disagree. Give a reason someone else can examine. One defensible response might honor the promise while offering another time or helper for the move. If a serious urgent need emerged, reconsider the balance. Name that condition. The check is the quality and consistency of your reasons, not whether your answer matches an automatic score.
No. Cadence builds the course when you type the sentence and answer a few setup questions, so the lessons follow your situation. This page describes what a course built from this request covers. You see the whole path before Lesson 1.
State the facts and uncertainties, identify affected people, then compare consequences, duties and character. Explain where those considerations conflict and what could change your judgment. A framework helps structure reasoning; it does not automatically select the right action. It sits under Philosophy in the Ideas & discovery part of the library.
No. Setup asks what you already know and where you want to use it, and the course starts from there. Bring a real situation if you have one; the examples are built around it.
Most courses run 7 to 30 lessons. The course length is sized to what you asked for. You set the pace: one lesson at a time, as often as you like. Lessons can be read or played as audio.
No. Cadence is for practical self-learning and does not award accredited degrees or professional certification.
Start today
A starting goal
I want to reason more clearly about ethical dilemmas. Compare consequences, duties, and virtues using everyday cases where reasonable people might disagree.
Want new features first?