You can follow the abstract
You want to check whether the full paper supports its headline claim.
Courses
Start with three things you can do today
Learn to read a scientific paper section by section
Read a scientific paper and explain what its evidence supports.
Practise reading a full empirical paper section by section, building a figure note and tracing references. Start with the fictional exercise below, then use this suggested learning goal to build a course around your subject and experience. This is a course idea, not a fixed set of written lessons.
Want new features first?
Type this when Cadence asks what you want to learn
I want to read a scientific paper and explain what its evidence supports. Help me follow the question, methods, results and limits without assuming I already know the subject.
Change any word so it fits your situation. The course is built from what you type and a few setup questions.
Start today
Three things you can do before the course exists.
Useful on their own. The course is for when you want the whole skill, not just the first move.
-
Read a caption before judging a bar
Fictional figure: a bar chart shows mean seedling height on day 14. Group A is 12 centimetres and group B is 15 centimetres. The caption says the bars show group means and the whiskers show the minimum and maximum. Write one sentence describing the difference and identify what the whiskers represent.
-
Check your figure note
Group B is 3 centimetres taller on average at day 14. The whiskers describe the range of observed heights, not a confidence interval. Neither the means nor the caption tells you how seedlings entered the groups. That information belongs in the methods. This is an invented reading exercise, not a real experiment.
-
Make a note that points back to the paper
Record the figure number, outcome, units, time point, comparison, exact meaning of the whiskers and a question for the methods section. A useful note lets you find the evidence again. If a caption defines error bars differently, use that definition instead.
Sources: Trent University: reading scientific papers. Practical examples are starting points, not promised results.
- Best for
- Science & nature
- Prerequisites
- None. Bring the situation you have.
- Course length
- 7 to 30 lessons, sized to your goal
- Pace
- Yours. One lesson at a time, as often as you like.
- Format
- Read it, or play the audio
- Access
- Available on the App Store and Google Play, with an optional early testing list
Before the course is built
Setup asks about your situation first.
Lesson 1 opens on the moment you describe, and the examples use your role. For this request, expect questions like these.
- What subject do you want to read research about, and what background do you have?
- Are you reading for curiosity, a class or a specific decision?
- Which part is hardest: methods, figures, statistics or interpreting the conclusion?
Right for now
If any of this sounds familiar, start here.
You lose the question in the details
You want a reading route that keeps the comparison and outcome visible.
You want to explain a finding carefully
You want to distinguish the observed result from a causal or general claim.
Course arc
Where the course goes, in order.
Cadence writes the lessons for you, so the exact path follows your answers. This is the ground a course built from this sentence covers.
01 / 06The question behind the title
Translate a paper title into a specific research question and distinguish observation from explanation.
Who entered the study
Inspect recruitment, comparison groups, assignment and missing follow-up.
What was measured
Check outcome definitions, scales, denominators and timing.
Figures and uncertainty
Read captions and axes, then identify uncertainty and unfamiliar analysis that need further checking.
From result to claim
Compare the evidence with a headline and rewrite claims that exceed the design.
A paper in your subject
Apply the reading framework to a suitable public paper and record remaining questions.
What changes
What you will be able to do, and what you will stop believing.
You will be able to
Map the study
Identify the question, units, comparison and outcome before judging the conclusion.
Read a result with its denominator
Explain a number or figure alongside the group and measurement it describes.
Write a bounded summary
State what the evidence supports, what is uncertain and what to investigate next.
Ideas this course corrects
An abstract is the whole evidence
The abstract summarizes the paper. Check methods and results before relying on its conclusion.
A difference automatically proves a cause
Study design, alternative explanations and uncertainty affect what a comparison supports.
Course questions
What to know before you start.
Learn to read a scientific paper section by section: what can I do today?
Read a caption before judging a bar. Fictional figure: a bar chart shows mean seedling height on day 14. Group A is 12 centimetres and group B is 15 centimetres. The caption says the bars show group means and the whiskers show the minimum and maximum. Write one sentence describing the difference and identify what the whiskers represent. Check your figure note. Group B is 3 centimetres taller on average at day 14. The whiskers describe the range of observed heights, not a confidence interval. Neither the means nor the caption tells you how seedlings entered the groups. That information belongs in the methods. This is an invented reading exercise, not a real experiment. Make a note that points back to the paper. Record the figure number, outcome, units, time point, comparison, exact meaning of the whiskers and a question for the methods section. A useful note lets you find the evidence again. If a caption defines error bars differently, use that definition instead.
Is this a fixed course?
No. Cadence builds the course when you type the sentence and answer a few setup questions, so the lessons follow your situation. This page describes what a course built from this request covers. You see the whole path before Lesson 1.
Who is this course for?
Practise reading a full empirical paper section by section, building a figure note and tracing references. Start with the fictional exercise below, then use this suggested learning goal to build a course around your subject and experience. This is a course idea, not a fixed set of written lessons. It sits under Science & nature in the Ideas & discovery part of the library.
Do I need any prior experience?
No. Setup asks what you already know and where you want to use it, and the course starts from there. Bring a real situation if you have one; the examples are built around it.
How long does it take?
Courses run 7 to 30 lessons, sized to what you asked for. You set the pace: one lesson at a time, as often as you like. Lessons can be read or played as audio.
Does this course award a certificate or degree?
No. Cadence is for practical self-learning and does not award accredited degrees or professional certification.
Start today
Type it, answer a few questions, open Lesson 1.
The sentence to type
I want to read a scientific paper and explain what its evidence supports. Help me follow the question, methods, results and limits without assuming I already know the subject.
Want new features first?