You reward everyone the same way
Public praise thrills one person and mortifies another, and you cannot tell which is which.
Ask what supports good work and check the actual constraints.
Ask about preferences and investigate obstacles before choosing recognition or incentives. Missing access, unclear priorities and workload are practical issues, not proof of poor motivation. Use the example below to test one concrete adjustment.
Want new features first?
A starting goal
I want to understand what motivates different people on a team. Help me support good work without assuming everyone wants the same rewards or attention.
Change any word so it fits your situation. The course is built from what you type and a few setup questions.
Start today
Useful on their own. The course is for when you want the whole skill, not just the first move.
Original example: 'Would you prefer to present your analysis yourself, or have me summarize it and credit you?' Ask instead of assuming that public attention is a reward for everyone.
Suppose the person cannot finish without access to the approved data. Resolve access through the normal process or adjust the deadline. A motivational speech would not supply the missing input.
Check whether the obstacle was removed and the work could proceed. Ask whether the recognition format suited them. This tests a practical adjustment; it does not diagnose motivation or prove that one reward works universally.
Before the course is built
Lesson 1 opens on the moment you describe, and the examples use your role. For this request, expect questions like these.
Right for now
Public praise thrills one person and mortifies another, and you cannot tell which is which.
They used to care visibly, and something changed, and you do not know what.
Effort is fine and energy is missing, and incentives have not moved it.
Course arc
Cadence writes the lessons for you, so the exact path follows your answers. This is the ground a course built from this sentence covers.
01 / 06Exploring preferences, working conditions and practical constraints without assuming one universal motivator.
Questions that reveal what someone is working for, without making it an interrogation.
Discussing autonomy, progress and meaning as possible considerations alongside pay, workload and other conditions.
Public, private, written, specific: matching acknowledgement to the person.
Distinguishing burnout, boredom, unfairness and life outside work, and what you can do about each.
Working within limited authority: attention, trust and the design of the work itself.
What changes
Learn to ask, and to notice, what drives each person: mastery, autonomy, recognition, security, purpose.
Match how you acknowledge good work to the person receiving it.
Investigate unclear expectations and practical constraints without diagnosing a colleague's motivation or health.
Preferences and circumstances differ. Ask, and remain fair about opportunities and resources.
Unclear priorities, workload, missing tools and other constraints may be relevant. Investigate before assigning a cause.
Course questions
Ask about a specific work condition. Original example: 'Would you prefer to present your analysis yourself, or have me summarize it and credit you?' Ask instead of assuming that public attention is a reward for everyone. Remove a concrete obstacle. Suppose the person cannot finish without access to the approved data. Resolve access through the normal process or adjust the deadline. A motivational speech would not supply the missing input. Review the actual effect. Check whether the obstacle was removed and the work could proceed. Ask whether the recognition format suited them. This tests a practical adjustment; it does not diagnose motivation or prove that one reward works universally.
No. Cadence builds the course when you type the sentence and answer a few setup questions, so the lessons follow your situation. This page describes what a course built from this request covers. You see the whole path before Lesson 1.
Ask about preferences and investigate obstacles before choosing recognition or incentives. Missing access, unclear priorities and workload are practical issues, not proof of poor motivation. Use the example below to test one concrete adjustment. It sits under Leadership in the Work & ambitions part of the library.
No. Setup asks what you already know and where you want to use it, and the course starts from there. Bring a real situation if you have one; the examples are built around it.
Most courses run 7 to 30 lessons. The course length is sized to what you asked for. You set the pace: one lesson at a time, as often as you like. Lessons can be read or played as audio.
No. Cadence is for practical self-learning and does not award accredited degrees or professional certification.
Start today
A starting goal
I want to understand what motivates different people on a team. Help me support good work without assuming everyone wants the same rewards or attention.
Want new features first?